PAPR Reduction of OFDM signals using PTS and Firefly algorithm

Abstract

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) has the following benefits: excessive records fees and dependable transmission over fading channels. A significant disadvantage is the fact that it has an excessive peak-to-average strength ratio (PAPR). Numerous algorithms had been created to minimise the PAPR, every with its very own blessings and drawbacks. The Gaussian Firefly technique and the partial transmit sequence (PTS) are of the best algorithms. The Gaussian Firefly method can be used on this task to reduce PAPR. This approach makes use of swarm intelligence to tune the segment vectors so that you can decorate PAPR performance. As compared to current approaches, the suggested Firefly algorithm-based total PTS (FF-PTS) is a good way to obtain enhanced PAPR characteristics for OFDM signals.

Introduction

C. PTS Technique

As a result of the excessive PAPR, energy amplifiers function in a non-linear zone, main to intermodulation distortions and out-of-band radiations [23]. For this reason, decreasing PAPR is crucial. Tone reservation (TR), tone injection (TI), selective mapping (SLM), coding, amplitude clipping and filtering, active constellation extension (ACE), partial transmit sequence (PTS), and others have all been utilised to reduce PAPR.[2]

A successful and distortion-free method for PAPR reduction that well integrates signal sub-blocks is the conventional PTS approach. The PTS approach's aim is to create an excellent phase vector for the sub-block that lowers the PAPR [18]. It is hard to design the appropriate phase issue from a collection of recognized answers because the optimization trouble is complicated and nonlinear.[8]

D. PAPR Reduction using PTS

The PTS approach divides the enter symbol series into some of discontinuous symbol subsequences [3]. After every symbol subsequence has gone through IFFT, the resulting sign subsequences are elevated with the aid of using diverse rotation vectors and then added. The signal sequence with the lowest PAPR is finally transmitted after calculating the PAPR of each succeeding sequence.[19]

E. Firefly Algorithm

During the night, wingless beetles or bugs called fireflies produce light and blink. Bioluminescence is the term for a chemically produced light that comes from the lower abdomen and has neither an infrared nor an ultraviolet frequency [21]. They specifically employ the flash light to attract potential companions or prey. The flash light also serves as a warning system to alert the firefly to potential predators.[11]

The Firefly Algorithm is developed under the following assumptions:

1. Since the fireflies are unisexual, they may be attracted to each other no matter their sexual orientation.
2. Since attractiveness and brightness are inversely associated, the more attractive firefly will attract the much less attractive one. The fireflies' allure, however, faded as their separation increased.
3. The firefly may move quite randomly if their brightness is the same in all of them.[9]

The Firefly algorithm was inspired by the flashing behavior of fireflies and the phenomenon of bioluminescent communication.

New solutions are generated via random walks and firefly attraction. The fireflies' brightness must be related to how effectively the issue relates to the objective function [22]. Depending on how attractive they are, they could break up themselves up into smaller groups, and every one converges at the local models. FA is accordingly appropriate for troubles related to optimization.[10]

F. Firefly and PTS(FF-PTS)

PTS and firefly algorithms when combined will reduce PAPR with greater efficiency [24].

SNR as opposed to BER graph is plotted above. SNR, or signal-to-noise ratio, is a measure of how strong the signal is in comparison to noise. This is gift inside the communique channel. A higher SNR in an OFDM system can be attained by amplifying the transmitted signal, employing error- correcting codes, or minimizing channel interference from other signals.

The amount of bit error between sent and received signals is measured by the BER metric. A declining BER leads to an improvement in signal quality. By utilizing error- correcting codes or eliminating channel interference from other signals, an OFDM system can obtain a reduced BER. SNR and BER are improved.

Conclusion

While maintaining a minimal computing load, the suggested FF-PTS system\'s performance offered nearly identical PAPR statistics to the optimal exhaustive PTS. Results demonstrate that the suggested strategy is effective in lowering the PTS algorithm\'s computational complexity. The proposed FF-PTS era gives a sensible and cost-powerful solution to the hassle of excessive PAPR in OFDM systems.

References

[1] I. Baig and V. Jeoti, “DCT precoded SLM technique for PAPR reduction in OFDM systems,” in Intelligent and Advanced Systems (ICIAS), [2] S. H. Han and J. H. Lee, “An overview of peak-to-average power ratio reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission,” Wireless Communications, IEEE, [3] S. H. Han and J. H. Lee, “PAPR reduction of OFDM signals using a reduced complexity PTS technique,” Signal Processing Letters, IEEE [4] N. V. Irukulapati, V. K. Chakka and A. Jain, “SLM based PAPR reduction of OFDM signal using new phase sequence,” Electronics letters, [5] V. Tarokh and H. Jafarkhani, “On the computation and reduction of the peak-to average power ratio in multicarrier communications,” Communications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 37-44, 2000. [6] R. Van Nee and R. Prasad, ‘’OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications’’, Artech House, London, UK, 1st edition, 2000. [7] T. Jiang and Y. Imai, “An overview: peak-to- average power ratio reduction techniques for OFDM signals,” IEEE Trans. On Wireless Communications, June 2008. [8] Blum, C. and Li, X. (2008). Swarm Intelligence in Optimization. Natural Computing Series. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 43-85. [9] Xin She Yang. (2011). Optimization Algorithms. Comput. Optimization, Methods and Algorithms, SCI 356. pp. 13–31. [10] Yang, X. S. (2010), Firefly Algorithm, Stochastic Test Functions and Design Optimization. Int.J. Bio-Inspired Computation. 2, No. 2, pp.78–84. [11] Yang, X.S. (2010). Firefly Algorithm for Multimodal Optimization. In: Stochastic Algorithms:Foundations and Applications, SAGA 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Vol. 5792, pp.169-178. [12] H. Rohling, T. May, K. Bruninghaus, and R. Grunheid, “Broad-band OFDM radio transmission for multimedia applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, pp. 1778– 1789, Oct 1999. 50 [13] Z. Wang and G. Giannakis, “Wireless multicarrier communications,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 17, pp. 29–48, May 2000. [14] B. Saltzberg, “Performance of an Efficient Parallel Data Transmission System,” IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, vol. 15, pp. 805– 811, December 1967. [15] R. Chang and R. Gibby, “A Theoretical Study of Performance of an Orthogonal Multiplexing Data [16] Transmission Scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, vol. 16, pp. 529–540, August 1968. [17] G. Franco, G.A.and Lachs, “An Orthogonal Coding Technique for Communications,” in IRE International Convension Record, vol. 9, pp. 126–133, 1961. [18] S. Darlington, “On digital single-sideband modulators,” IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, vol. 17, pp. 409–414, Aug 1970. [19] S. Weinstein and P. Ebert, “Data Transmission by Frequency-Division Multiplexing Using the Discrete Fourier Transform,” IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, vol. 19, pp. 628–634, October 1971. [20] S. Muller and J. Huber, “OFDM with reduced peak-to-average power ratio by optimum combination of PTS,” Electronics Letters, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 368–369, 1997. [21] M.-H. Horng, “Vector quantization using the firefly algorithm for image compression,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, pp. 1078–1091, 2012. [22] X. S. Yang, “Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation,” Int. J. Bio-Inspired Comput., vol. 2, pp. 78–84, Mar. 2010 [23] I. Fister, I. F. Jr., X.-S. Yang, and J. Brest, “A comprehensive review of firefly algorithms,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 13, no. 0, pp. 34 – 46, 2013. [24] P. Sharma, “Performance evaluation of OFDM system in terms of PAPR,” in Second International Conference on Advanced Computing Communication Technologies (ACCT), 2012, pp. 214–218, Jan 2012. [25] X.-S. Yang, Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms. Luniver Press, 2008. [26] M. Sharif, M. Gharavi-Alkhansari, and B. Khalaj, “On the peak-to-average power of OFDM signals based on oversampling,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 51, pp. 72–78, Jan 2003.

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 G. Krishna Reddy, A. Lalitha, A. Sandhya, M. Veena, M. Sri Pujitha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.